Posts Tagged ‘education’

Part 2: Surveyors Prep for Survey and the New Entrance Interviews

Tuesday, March 29th, 2011

CMS has developed a new survey process for Home Health Agencies that will be effective May 1, 2011. It is data driven, patient outcome-oriented, but according to CMS, is less structured yet very process oriented.

For more detailed information, visit http://www.cms.gov/Surveycertificationgeninfo/downloads/SCLetter11_11.pdf to read the advanced copy.

Under revised survey protocols, agencies will be evaluated on a set of 34 standards, known as Level 1 standards. If the surveyor finds a deficiency on any one of the new highest priority standards, a partial extended survey will be conducted.

During that survey, the agency will be evaluated on 27 Level 2 standards. Both sets of standards fall under the nine conditions of participation. Surveyors must conduct extended surveys of all CoPs when any of the more serious condition level deficiencies are cited. Part 1 of this series outlined each CoP and where the G Tag fell; Level 1 or Level 2.

Many agency leaders are stating that it seems the new survey process has more detailed guidance to reduce surveyor inconsistency.

The survey tasks have been clearly delineated by CMS:

  • Task 1- Pre-Survey Preparation
  • Task 2- Entrance Interview
  • Task 3- Information Gathering
  • Task 4- Information Analysis
  • Task 5- Exit Conference
  • Task 6-Formation of the Statement of Deficiencies

Pre-Survey Preparation

Surveyors will prepare for surveys, more indepthly, using OASIS data, previous survey findings, and complaints filed.  Available OASIS reports can be generated for specific time periods, as requested, from the OASIS Coordinator’s office. These reports include case-mix, potentially avoidable events, risk adjusted outcomes based quality improvement (OBQI) or process measure reports.

OBQM Potentially Avoidable Events Report

Know that before coming to the home health agency, the surveyor will have reviewed the most recent quarter of OASIS data to identify patients with emergent care as a result of a fall at home or emergent care for wound infection or deteriorating wound status. This is a Tier 1 event. There are six Tier 2 Potentially Avoidable Events for consideration. To reach the threshold there must be patients who experienced the event and/or the agency to be surveyed must have a current incidence rate equal to or greater than twice the reference rate (Appendix B p.12)

OBQI Outcome Report

Surveyors will also review the agency’s Risk-adjusted Outcomes Report prior to survey. CMS instructs surveyors : “During the onsite survey, select patient records and home visits that focus on the outcomes identified on the OBQI report meeting the individual investigation thresholds” (Appendix B. p12).  If none of the ten listed outcomes trigger the selection criteria, another outcome should be selected from the OBQI report (that meets the selection criteria).

Patient/Agency Characteristics Report

As part of the pre survey process, the surveyor will look at this report for the same timeframe as the OBQI Outcome Report and focus on acute conditions and home care diagnoses that are statistically significant or are equal to or greater than 15% points higher than the reference rate. The surveyor is to choose up to three diagnoses or conditions that meet the criteria and look at corresponding patient records.

Error Summary Report by HHA

Surveyors will be looking for several inconsistencies and errors, such as  inconsistent M0090 date and incorrect record sequence. The latter error could trigger further record reviews if the HHA’s percent of assessments with this error in or above 10%.

What Can an Agency Do on an Ongoing Basis?

Routinely, agencies should be reviewing the online OASIS reports and identifying areas for improvement. They should show interventions planned and implementation of the plan. The agency should also reflect follow up to implementation. This practice establishes a commitment to Quality Improvement and seeking proactive interventions for areas such as recurring hospital admissions.

Part 3: Entrance Interview

CMS remains detailed as to activities that are to be included in the entrance interview.  This interview sets the tone for the survey process identifying expectations. We will explore those in the next article.

Coding Whitepaper

Monday, January 31st, 2011

“Industry Changes are Driving Increased Coding and Financial Complexity.”

Every home health agency wants their deserved reimbursement for the care delivered to their patient and just as importantly, they want to retain that revenue. A good start toward achieving that goal is having coding team expertise.

According to one source, the average loss on a miscoded record is hovering around $1200+. The reasons for the errors vary; experience of the coding team, training level, maintaining competency and adherence to coding guidelines and conventions with the hundreds of changes that occur annually and not to mention the over 100,000 changes coming with ICD-10. A coding team needs to be dedicated to just that: coding, not other distracting duties. The team needs coders and clinicians so the full prospective of the patient portrait is accurately presented and the proper codes are compliantly assigned.

With tighter reimbursement, outcomes affecting future reimbursement, and coding driving certain audit alerts, coding is the area that requires emphasis.

Select Data has written a white paper on this subject. Looking at industry complexity and how coding importance came to the forefront to identifying the relationship of case-mix profile and case-mix adjustment models to coding. In addition, understanding the components of the HIPPS Codes as well as how supplies must link to diagnostic codes is included.

Success in this industry usually means the home health leaders have a good understanding of why the change in CMS focus as well as what is expected from that focus. Included in this white paper, you will also find the documentation requirements for coding in general as well as examples of the therapy risk areas. Documentation must be objective and specific. Just what does that mean? Clear examples are presented.

Being alert for “alerts.” Do you know what MAC alert 5023T means? You need this kind of information from your coding team.

The value of compliant coding is proper payment and peace of mind. This is not a trite statement. It is a desire of agency leaders who are working diligently to comply with quality parameters, best practices, and regulatory statutes and law.

To read the full white paper, please go to: Coding Whitepaper PDF

The Face-to-Face Encounter and the Final CY 2011 Rule

Friday, December 10th, 2010

There has been much discussion re the Face to Face Encounter required by the Affordable Care Act and a part of the CY 2011 Final Rule. (See page 296 of the Final Rule) What exactly is required?

The new regulation requires a patient to have been seen by the certifying physician within 90 days prior to the Start of Care (SOC). If that is not achieved, the patient must be seen within 30 days of admission to the home health agency.

The physician is required to document on the certification how the clinical findings of the encounter support eligibility requirements as well as primary focus of home care. (See pages 498-500 of the rule). The certifying physician must document that they or a specified Nurse Practitioner had the required face to face encounter (including use of telehealth which is subject to requirements in 1834 (m) of the Act).

The physician must document either on the certification form itself or as an addendum to it that the patient has a condition warranting home health involvement, that the patient is homebound, and has needs for skilled services. Per the letter sent to physicians from CMS dated 12/10/2011,

·            ”The face to face encounter must occur within the 90 days prior to the start of care, or within the 30 days after the start of care. While the long standing requirement for physicians to order and certify the need for home health remains unchanged, this new requirement assures that the physician’s order is based on current knowledge of the patient’s condition”

·            The new regulation effects Starts of Care initiated on or after January 1, 2011.

The final Rule states that agencies may not use “standardized encounter language” on the face to face encounter form that the physician must sign. A “template” may be used that allows physicians to describe the patient’s condition and primary reason for the encounter and referral to home health.

As a service to our clients and other agency leaders, Select Data has prepared a sample Face to Face Encounter Form for your use. You will note that it meets the requirements of:

·            Specifying the individual completing the face to face encounter

·            Specifying the date of the encounter

·            Specifying the primary medical reason/diagnosis/condition for the encounter

·            Specifying additional clinical findings that support home health medical necessity

·            Specifying the patient meets the CMS requirements of Chapter 7 Medicare Benefits Manual for homebound status

·            Specifying findings of the encounter support the skilled services for home health; SN, PT, S/LP

·            Signature and Date of the Physician

Please note the MLN website will have a special edition article which may be found at http://www.cms.gov/MLNGenInfo

Documentation Face to Face Encounter


PT/INR Evaluation Tool

Friday, November 12th, 2010

Tracking PT/INR EvaluationPT/INR is a commonly used evaluation Lab test…
The Prothrombin Time (PT) evaluates the ability of the blood to clot properly. It is used to evaluate coagulation factors and bleeding likelihood of patients on anticoagulant therapy. This therapy is used to inhibit blood clots of patients who have had inappropriate clotting usually after a heart attack or after a deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The anticoagulant drugs must be monitored carefully so as to have a healthy balance between preventing a clot and causing excessive bleeding. The International Normalized Ration (INR) is used to monitor the effectiveness of the anticoagulant drugs.
Here is a handy tool to assist clinicians in monitoring not only the physician’s order but the follow up after the results are received.

Infection Risk Assessment Tool

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

This Infection Risk Assessment Tool offers an easy and quick review of client predisposing factors that aid in preventing infection. The clinician has the opportunity to evaluate education and training needs for patients and family members. It also allows for tracking of signs and symptoms, cultures, and outcomes including unscheduled hospitalizations and secondary infection development.
It is the goal of Select Data to frequently offer tools for home health leaders and clinicians. You should expect to see clinical and operational tools geared toward assisting to identify areas of preventive practice and opportunities for training and education as well .

Expect future tools to focus on Cardiac Status, Dementia, Depression, as well in addition to business and QI tools.

Infection Control Tool (Excel)

Infection Control Tool (PDF)