Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

ICD – 10 CM: Completing the Gap Analysis and Transition Plan (Part 2 of a Coding Series)

Thursday, August 30th, 2012

ICD-10 CM is going to impact the entire home health industry and every department of your agency. Now that we know that the implementation date will be October 1, 2014, agencies need to establish a solid plan now. You need every day of the 24 months to educate, plan, educate, implement, reevaluate, test and retest, and educate.  Training for coding specialists is important, but training for those who will use the data will be equally important.

Creating a roadmap for ICD-10 integration within an organization may appear daunting. Let’s break down the process. CMS suggests presenting an overview of ICD-10 to the entire organization. This allows individuals to process the changes in ICD-10 and align those changes to processes they presently complete. This assists the organization to understand the depth and impact of ICD-10.

Completing the Gap Analysis

Define the agency’s present state. Review the list of processes for each department from intake of a potential patient to filing of the final claim of the patient and the resulting data analytics. Identify how the coding touches each area of work flow.

Identify the agency’s strong competencies and the additional training to maintain those competencies. Look at performance levels and consider the impact of ICD-10 on performance. Considering the increased specificity of ICD-10 coding, what will be the impact on clinical and operational processes? What new clinical tools will be needed? What form changes will be required? How will internal and external reports be impacted?

List, then communicate with vendors, payor sources, and clearinghouses. Where are they in their processes? What are their plans? Will they be ready?

Identify the timeline for the Gap analysis.

Organize an ICD-9/ICD-10 Transition Team

The goal of the team is to establish an overall organizational plan after the Transition Team either completes or receives from another committee, a Gap analysis; operational and technical impact analysis. The new Transitional Team should review that overall analysis, using those specific organization findings to provide the base of their project/transition plan.

The Transition Team should have representatives of each department: intake, clinical, IT, HIM, billing, QA, internal auditing, and administration so that they can adequately develop an expansive implementation strategy.

Choose a project leader of the transition team. This leader must organize the development of a budget, a timeline and action/project plan that will include a training plan for the organization. It must demonstrate how findings and planning will be communicated. The project/transition plan needs to be tied to endpoints that are reasonable and measureable. Compliance plays a huge role. The plan must be compliance oriented; attending to statute, convention, guideline and regulation.

Report from each Department Representative and Plan Creation

The representative from each department; IT/technology, Clinical, Coding, Revenue Cycle/billing/finance, QA/QI/Audit, Data Analytics, and Education/Training  must lead the indepth department evaluation as well as the department project plan.

What will be the impact to each department?

Coding specificity?

Impact on data capture at intake? At time of assessment? On data analytics and reports?

Impact on the plan of care (485)? Consistency of diagnosis/supportive documentation/careplan

What about the schedule and the depth of schedule notes?

Utilization and quality process and improvement

Need for increased clinical cues

Time/ amount to capture data at all time/patient points

Field sizes, alphanumeric composition, and decimal use

Code value alteration with Table structure alteration

Edit and logic changes

Overlapping time point of ICD-9 and ICD-10

Impact on the EMR

Impact on interfaces

Impact on HR and personnel needs

Education and training needed for each department

Budget creation for the project

Who will monitor the vendors and payors?

Do not trust the statement that the vendor will be ready. Your agency cash flow could be dependent upon their planning, testing, and implementation.

Ask to see the vendor plan and monitor progress to general goal completion. When will the upgrades or new software be available?

Evaluate health plan readiness. Evaluate the impact of ICD-10 on usual and customary reimbursement fee schedules as well as episodic reimbursement.

Training and Education

You want to prevent agency claim rejections as well as delays in processes. You want personnel comfortable with new processes. You want to be compliant.

Each department will have different training needs. Obviously, the biller does not need the same level of coding expertise as a credentialed coder, but they require an understanding of the impact of the new coding on their particular processes.

The leader of this department will need to work closely with each department head as to specific training needs as well as the best methods of training. Additional assessments needed include: Can the agency provide all, some, or none of the training needed? What training method will work best for the learners? Will classrooms and teleconferences work best? Should they be augmented by web-based learning? Are inservices and seminars by experts another route to pursue?

Consider length of time for education and training. Some departments will require more training over a longer period of time.

Coders will need an indepth review of Anatomy, Physiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Pharmacology. Each of these areas should be relational to disease states so that a comprehensive understanding of the new code application exists.

Whether you code inhouse or you contract with outside experts, be certain that parallel coding will occur for several weeks before the new codes are applied to the claims. October 1, 2014 should mean all training and education has been completed, processes have been reviewed and tested. Be certain that data analytics and infomatics are meeting the new specificity requirements.

Clinicians will need a solid understanding of the specificity of the documentation now required. They will need orientation to the more indepth assessment tools. Clinical cues as to diagnosis documentation requirements will be needed.  

Hopefully, vendors will be able to assist clinicians so technology can be leveraged to make up for the detailed documentation needed.

October 1, 2014 will be the ICD-10 implementation date. You have only 2 years to complete the Gap analysis, establish the Transition Team, create the transition plans, lead and evaluate training/education needs of all departments, create new tools needed, modify and test processes as well as review data created and have all processes in place to submit compliant claims. You need to start NOW! You only have two years and the clock is ticking.

 

The Corporate Compliance Program in Healthcare

Tuesday, August 30th, 2011

The government is escalating investigations through Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs), Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs), Medicaid Integrity Contractors (MICs),  Zone Program Integrity Contractors (Z-PICs), and now, the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT).  Home Health agencies are at a critical crossroads.  It is essential that agencies take control, review processes, and proactively identify and address vulnerable areas.

The MACs are looking at current claims filed. The RACs have taken a retrospective look at claims, but it has been the Z-PICs who have been busy. They are the auditors using refined algorithms to identify risk patterns.

The RAC auditors have been authorized to recover “improper payments “of preapproved areas of risk.  In the demonstration project, high areas of risk included incorrectly coded records, therapy appropriateness, and medically unnecessary services. The industry has concerns that therapy 13th, 19th visit and 30 day assessments will be a prime target. What about the Face–to-Face encounter?  RACs are expected to be busy, busy, busy when probing compliance with that regulation.

The HSS and the U.S. Department of Justice have teamed up to create the new Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT) to investigate and work to eliminate fraud in healthcare. They are using predictive modeling algorithms and high level technology as key tools for their mission. Their initial focus  has been directed toward Durable Medical Equipment, as well as services paid for by Medicare Part C (Medicare Advantage) and Part D (Prescription Drug Programs).

Now, more than ever a strong Corporate Compliance Program is essential in the industry.

Agencies should be auditing samples of past claims, reviewing present processes, educating personnel, and updating their present Corporate Compliance Plan. The OIG believes that effective compliance programs should include the following components, which are based on the seven steps of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.

Components of a Compliance Plan:

  1. Compliance Policies and Procedures to include written standards of conduct
  1. Designation of a Compliance Officer and Compliance Committee
  2. Ongoing Education and Training
  3. Effective lines of communication; Process for Reporting Concerns, such as a hotline
  1. Enforcement of Standards
  2. Development of an Auditing and Monitoring System
  3. Corrective Action Process for Correcting Compliance Problems

The Corporate Compliance Plan should represent the corporate wide initiative designed to detect and prevent problems of noncompliance and include:

  • An Introduction and Purpose complete with expectations.
  • Directives
    • Key Personnel
    • Standards
    • Reporting
    • Confidentiality
    • Response and Corrective Action
    • Enforcement and Discipline
    • Ø Standardized Conduct
    • Standards for Business Conduct
    • Code of Conduct

Code of Ethics

  • Employee Open Communication
    • Agreement with the National Hotline Service
    • Tracking all calls including interventions

Effective programs have strong internal controls to promote adherence to applicable federal and state laws. They will also include internal auditing components of agency processes, services, and products with feedback mechanisms. There is a well defined agency code of conduct with a compliant culture and frequent employee training.  An infrastructure includes a Corporate Compliance Officer who, in addition to other duties, will monitor industry areas audit focus. The agency can then explore their vulnerabilities.

The OIG Top Medicare PPS Compliance Issues include:

  • Reporting additional visits not made in order to exceed LUPA and therapy thresholds
  • Providing additional visits to avoid LUPA and therapy thresholds
  • Upcoding  and downcoding on the OASIS
  • Duplicate bills and timeliness
  • Returning credit balances promptly
  • Routine waivers of copays
  • Billing for services without physician orders

The RAC Demonstration Project issues include:

  • Incorrectly coded 35%
  • Lack of Medical Necessity 40%
  • Insufficient documentation 10%

What are your audits reflecting? Is documentation adequate to support all diagnoses? Does the documentation support the skill necessary for each visit?

Besides the above areas that might include potential claims fraud and quality of care false claims (False Claims Act 31 U.S.C. 3730), home health Corporate Compliance Officers must also  be aware of HIPAA compliance, Patient Freedom of Choice 1802, Conditions of Participation (COP) and licensure violations as well as monitoring referrals to prevent referral kickback violations (Stark II, Phase III, SSA 1877) and Civil Monetary Penalties, SSA 1128(a)(5).

Home health agency compliance officers should expect to remain on the frontline of risk assessment and enforcement of health care regulations. The RACs are only beginning their audits.

A positive by-product of an organization that effectively implements a Corporate Compliance Plan is the emergence of a renewed vision of the future. In this age of government audits, a forward thinking organization will create or update their program for all of the right reasons. However, corporations will soon realize that they can leverage their compliance programs as public relations tools, which not only affirm their role as solid community citizens, but, also as business associates who share commitment to integrity and ethics.

This week Select Data has provided a sample Corporate Compliance Power Point Presentation for your use. This can be used as a solid shell to have specifics of your organization added. It reinforces the basics. There is no such thing as no need for reinforcement in compliance, especially not in this climate.

To download a copy of this PowerPoint click here.

The Growing Importance of Revenue Cycle Management:

Friday, April 15th, 2011

Introduction to Decade’s Hottest Topic

by Ed Buckley 
with Tim Rowan

Lost revenue and poor compliance go hand in hand. They infiltrate a home health care agency together. 
Managing revenue cycle means improving compliance as much as it means ensuring complete and accurate billing processes and A/R follow up procedures. 

Compliance is the responsibility of all staff, especially those with clinical and financial responsibilities. In today’s Medicare environment — and it is not much different if a provider’s primary payer is insurance or the patient — mere automation is insufficient. Quality Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) processes are required today more than ever.

In fact, RCM is the number one key to meeting today’s home health compliance challenges. Considering the current regulatory environment, where we are seeing sharp increases in ADRs, the imminent rise of collection agencies such as Recovery Audit Contractors, and intensive, relentless MAC, MIC and Z-PIC audits, home healthcare processes and systems dare not fall short of the challenge.

RCM processes must build in compliance, not treat it as an afterthought or a luxury. Patient care is a complex proposition. Building in compliance requires that communication and interdisciplinary coordination are part of a plan of care that manages a patient’s medical needs. There are four key components to the process of building compliance into a plan of care:

  • technology
  • documentation
  • coding
  • billing

These four business pillars support RCM and form a foundation for compliance. Think of RCM as permeating the entire life cycle of a patient care episode, from referral to assessment to plan of care to patient record and finally to the revenue derived from that care. When a plan of care is carefully developed and managed through compliant systems and processes that all talk to each other, a complete management cycle results. When done right, the benefit of this cycle is that it provides the agency with a comprehensive, dynamic, profitable, accurate and compliant home healthcare business.

Most importantly, it results in the ability to provide the highest possible level of patient care, making the agency the first choice among doctors, hospitals and care planners.

Technology only part of the answer

In order to achieve compliance in the contemporary regulatory environment, home healthcare providers must employ more than just point-of-care technology and a centralized billing/coding system. It is imperative to utilize the RCM processes in order to verify assessments, review clinical processes and reconcile resulting data as part of compliant revenue generation. Incorporating RCM processes as part of an overall business strategy often results in improved reimbursement, bullet-proof billing compliance and stellar clinical outcomes.

Lost revenue and poor compliance go hand in hand because OASIS and coding errors are often the result of incomplete and incongruent assessments. Billing mistakes typically occur because visit activities vary from physician orders. Data errors are frequently triggered by hurried keying into point-of-care and EMR systems. A well-developed RCM system as part of operations, implemented in real time, can mitigate most of these costly mistakes. 

With compliance comes control and peace of mind. Compliance leads to more positive patient outcomes, fewer hospital readmissions, more retained revenue, greater efficiency and more predictable cash flow, while providing the business peace of mind that comes only when patient outcomes match plans of care. A home health agency’s business depends on the quality of patient care provided. Doctors, hospitals, and care planners need an agency they can trust to deliver quality care and outcomes, period. 

RCM begins with a complete data capture and error mitigation philosophy impacting every staff member and virtually every aspect of a healthcare provider’s business operations. This includes:

  • accurate patient assessments, the cornerstone
  • correct OASIS documentation
  • clean patient data
  • physician order monitoring
  • visit reconciliation
  • clinical coding with review
  • QI oversight
  • A/R management and collections follow-up

Systems must be designed into processes that identify errors prior to revenue generation. Catching up with after-the-fact chart audits is no longer an adequate process in today’s environment. Operations must have built-in processes that catch incongruence in real time while it is occurring…not after the bill has flown out the door. RCM systems monitor all administrative and clinical components that contribute to the capture, management and collection of patient service data.

The heart of the RCM process is a team of specialists charged with the responsibility of establishing and implementing policies, procedures, and performance measures and standards.

What RCM is and is not

RCM begins and ends with clinicians 
In order to obtain compliance within the RCM process, coding accuracy is indispensable. For the average home healthcare agency, however, achieving the necessary level of accuracy on a consistent basis is often an impossible dream. Among the most prominent roadblocks to coding success is the speed with which codes change. Dozens of alterations take place each year, seemingly in the blink of an eye. In 2009 alone, a total of 290 new codes were established. 

Coding errors create even more vexing challenges, the majority of which are related to documentation accuracy and completeness. Co-morbidities are missed during this phase, opening the floodgates to improper sequencing and inaccurate primary diagnoses. Clearly, RCM must begin with management’s confidence that assessments are accurate. Crucial to this phase are clinical tools. It is management’s responsibility to assemble the tools — especially comprehensive and ongoing training programs — that will properly channel the critical thinking skills required and expected of field staff.

Then, even with confidence in your staff’s coding and documentation skills, ensure excellence by assigning RN coding experts to review every assessment to see that every plan of care reflects best use of ever-changing codes and regulations. 

Accurate and compliant coding is not only the image of your standard of care that you broadcast to the community. It is the cornerstone of your ability to receive and retain revenue. Getting it right is the best way to grow your business and increase patient and doctor satisfaction with your plans of care. 

Cliché though it may be, there is a bottom line to consider here. Management’s focus on strong patient outcomes through compliance means greater revenue retention and the lowest audit risk. Clearly, effective RCM is a timely solution providing agencies with a foundation for a vigorous bottom line, a solid grip on financial activities, freedom to focus on priorities, and a welcome relief from compliance anxiety.

Ed Buckley is CEO of Select Data, a home care software and clinical services company based in Anaheim, California. He welcomes comments and can be reached at ed.buckley@selectdata.com

There are New Survey Protocols. Are You Ready? Part 1

Tuesday, March 29th, 2011

(Part 1, the Types of Surveys and Level 1 and Level 2 Citations)

CMS has released a revision of the Home Health Agency Survey Protocols and a New State Operations Manual. The new survey process is data-driven and patient outcome-oriented with less structure yet very process-driven. Surveyor worksheets are presently under development and will be released soon by CMS.

The advanced copy of the surveyor procedures introduces a tiered system that directs surveyors to focus on quality of care vs other operations such as HR files. A detailed list of surveyor probes are provided, outlining questions that may be asked throughout the survey process. Agencies should review the questions outlined for surveyors in order to prepare for the survey process. Preparation for this process will reinforce other patient focused processes. Are you ready? To read more, please visit: www.cms.gov/Surveycertificationgeninfo/downloads/SCLetter11_11.pdf

The survey process is guided by interpretive guidelines and survey protocols established to provide guidance for surveyors. They provide clarity as to intent of the regulations. All surveyors are required, by CMS, to utilize these guidelines when evaluating an agency as to compliance with Federal regulation. Remember, the guidelines do not replace regulation and are not allowed to be the basis of any citation, but they provide guidance.  Violations are to be based upon clinical record reviews, interviews with patients, caregivers, and personnel, as well as the agency’s practices in relationship to regulation and agency policies.

“The survey and certification process provides a method for CMS to evaluate HHA compliance with the Conditions of Participation (CoPs), ensuring that patient services provided meet minimum health and safety standards and a basic level of quality. The HHA survey process incorporates an approach that is patient-focused, outcome-oriented, and data-driven making it more efficient and effective in assessing, monitoring, and evaluating the quality of care delivered by an HHA…” (Appendix B, p.6).

The surveys are required to have at least one RN on the team.  Surveyors are required to attend the HHA Training Course prior to any survey. They are then required to be in an observational role as part of the training.

Types of Surveys

The survey process provides for a standard survey, a partial extended survey, and an extended survey. All HHA must undergo a standard survey.

Initial Certification

The initial certification requires compliance with SS Act1861(0)(4)  as well as 2180 regarding licensing requirements. In addition, follow the guidelines of SS2008 “Early Surveys of New Providers and Suppliers.

The State Agency (SA) surveyor or the National Accrediting Organization (AO) inclusive of Joint Commission, CHAP, or ACHC with deeming authority conducts the initial certification. At the time of that survey, the HHA must

  • Be operational and have completed the Medicare Enrollment 855A verified by the assigned MAC.
  • Provide nursing and one other therapeutic service (42 CFR 484.14(a).
  • Meet the new capitalization requirements and have completed an OASIS test submission.
  • Have provided care to a minimum of 10 patients requiring SKILLED care.

Standard Survey

This survey is to be a review of the quality of care and services furnished by the HHA as measured by the medical, nursing, and rehabilitative care indicators. The new changes require this survey to review compliance with regulations most related to high-quality patient care. These highest  priority standards (regulations)  are called Level 1 standards addressing 9 of the 15CoPs. The thinking is that if the agency is in compliance with these standards, it is in compliance with all CoPs.

Therefore,  “the surveyor can make a determination  that the HHA is in compliance with all CoPs when, after a review of the Level 1 standards, and after completing the required clinical record reviews, home visits, and interviews with patients and HHA staff, he/she does not discover any findings which would support a deficiency citation.”

Partial Extended Survey

This survey occurs when a standard level survey identifies a non compliant Level I standard and/or a deficiency practice may exist at a standard or conditional level not examined at the standard survey.  During this survey, the surveyor reviews at a minimum, the Level 2 standards under the same condition which are related to the non compliant Level 1 standards. See Table 1 Level 1 and Level 2 Standards.

Extended Survey

This survey includes a review of all conditions. It may be conducted at any time at the discretion of CMS  and is required to be conducted when any conditional level deficiency is identified. The surveyor is required to review all agency policies, procedures, and practices related to the substandard care (one or more condition –level deficiencies).

Recertification Survey

All HHAs are mandated (SS1891) to have a recertification performed no later than 36 months from a previous recertification survey. These surveys are standard unless a Level 1 citation is leveled.

Now, you know the types of surveys. The following chart lists the standard and partially extended surveys with their related priority standards. The more you know about the new process, the better prepared you will be for your next survey.

Next segment: Surveyors Prep for Survey, Entrance Interviews, Interview Questions They May Ask of Field Personnel and Clinical Managers. Are You Ready?

Level 1 and Level 2 Standards Appendix B
(revised 2/11/2011)

Table 1

Conditions

Standard Survey

Level 1

Partial Extended Survey

Level 2

484.10 Patient Rights G107, G109 G101, G108, G111, G114
484.12 Compliance with Federal, State. Local Laws G121 G118
484.14 Organization, Services and Administration G123, G133, G143,G144 G124, G125, G127, G138,
484.18 Acceptance of Patients, Plan of Care, Medical Supervision G157, G158, G159, G164, G165, G166 G160, G162, G163
484.30 Skilled Nursing Services G170, G172, G173, G174, G175, G176, G177 G169, G179
484.32 Therapy G186, G187, G188 G190, G193
484.36 Home Health Aide Services G224, G229 G212, G215, G225, G226, G230
484.48 Clinical Records G236 G239
484.55 Comprehensive Assessment of Patients G331, G332, G334,G445, G336, G337, G338, G340 G339, G341

CODING 2011: ICD-10-CM and Other Deadlines Looming

Monday, January 24th, 2011

Agency leaders know that now more than ever, coding is driving reimbursement. Agency leaders want appropriate payment and compliance. Besides coding itself, and CY 2011 changes, agency leaders need to be aware that other dates are looming in this area that can impact upon an agency’s success.

While Home Health Agencies were focusing on new CY 2011 regulations and plenty of changes, leaders need to remember that there was the change to Version 5010 for handling electronic claims. CMS will still accept Version 4010 claims until January 1, 2012. CMS expects that software vendors have been conducting internal testing so testing of the new version is now externally underway and full Level II compliance is completed by December 31, 2011.

To make this process as well as the transition to ICD-10 easier, the Coordination and Maintenance Committee has proposed ICD-9-CM coding changes be frozen, effective October 1, 2011.

“Recognizing the ICD-9-CM as a dynamic statistical tool that must be flexible to meet expanding classification needs, the ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee was created as a forum for proposals to update ICD-9-CM.  A representative from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) and one from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) co-chair the ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee meetings.  Responsibility for maintenance of the ICD-9-CM is divided between the two agencies, with classification of diagnoses (volumes 1 and 2) by NCHS and of procedures (volume 3) by CMS”. (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm_maintenance.htm).

The ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee’s role is advisory.  All final decisions are made by the Director of NCHS and the Administrator of CMS.  Final decisions are made after the December meeting and become effective October 1 of the following year. Official code revision packages, which are referred to as addenda, are available from this site.

The transition to ICD-10 is a major change for the industry. To better effect that transition as well as the Version 5010 to handle electronic claims, the ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee has proposed and accepted a partial freeze at a recent meeting. This freeze identifies:

  • The last regular annual updates to ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM would be made October 1, 2011
  • Limited updates to ICD-10 October 1, 2013 (ICD-10-CM is expected to be fully in use in Home Health by 2013)
  • Full regular updates to ICD-10 to be reinstituted October 1, 2014

Agencies need to be certain billing software vendors are in full testing for Version 5010 and are planning for ICD-10-CM. CMS reminds everyone that ICD-10-CM is far more comprehensive than ICD-9-CM and preparation should be underway now.  (www.cms.gov/ICD10).

What are the Differences between ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM?

ICD-9-CM:
17 chapters and V and E code chapters
13,000 disease codes plus V and E codes
3,000 procedure codes in Volume 3
3-5 digits in disease codes
Essentially numeric system
Codes usually do not indicate timing encounter
No differentiation between left/right

ICD-10-CM:
21 chapters- V and E codes in disease chapters
68,000 disease codes, including V and E codes
87,000 procedures codes in ICD-10-PCS
3-7 digits in disease codes
Alphanumeric system
Codes specify initial and subsequent encounters
Differentiates between the right and left
Expertise in anatomy, physiology, and diagnostics will be a must

Third Party Coding experts should already be actively into their plan for additional education of their coding teams. Some, like Select Data, have been stepping up training sessions and will be offering ongoing Anatomy, Physiology, and Diagnostic seminars to refresh and maintain currency among their credentialed experts. It may look like ICD-10 is far away but, an additional 55,000 diagnostic codes, an additional 84,000 procedure codes, and increased coding specificity to the 7th digit means increased risk for payment and more importantly, increased risk for payment retention. If your payment retention has been in question, can the MACs, RACs, or Z-PICs be far behind? Could you survive what is coming with what you have right now?