Archive for the ‘Teaching/Education’ Category

Education Videos: Coding Compliance Late Effects of CVA Part II of II

Monday, October 17th, 2011

Coding Compliance Late Effects of a CVA Part II of II

There are many occasions where weakness, dysphasia, aphasia are shown throughout the assessment, but unless documented as such we cannot conclude that these are complications of the CVA.  In SmartScribe the musculoskeletal section is often used by agencies to show late effects of a CVA.  There is a box marked hemiplegia, so please check that box and below that box it must be noted this is due to or related to CVA.  If you are using your own documentation please include in the narrative which diagnosis are related or due to the CVA.
As an additional note if the late effects of a CVA or hemiplegia is used we will note code separately abnormality of gate or muscle weakness these are inherent to hemiplegia.  Also, please specify whether the hemiplegia is on the dominant or non-dominant side so that we may use the best code for you.

In conclusion, in dealing with diabetic complications and late effects of a CVA please use the phrases “related to” or “due to” where appropriate so that we may use the most accurate codes as possible.

Education Videos: Coding Compliance Diabetic Complications – CVA Part I of II

Saturday, September 24th, 2011

Coding Compliance Diabetic Complications – CVA Part I of II

Coding Compliance Diabetic Complication – Late Effects of a CVA Part I

Many times we see a diagnosis of diabetes and throughout the assessment we will see PVD, Neuropathy, Chronic Kidney Disease, Ulcers, and other diagnoses.  We cannot code any of these complications unless they are documented as such.  If you are using the SmartScribe documentation there is a special section marked endocrine status which will list all of the complication.  So, please use this as it will make it very clear to us that these need to be coded as diabetic complications.  If you are using your own agencies documentation please include in the narrative that these diagnoses are diabetic complications.

Also, if there an ophthalmic complication of diabetes, please note what type of complication it is so that your coding is not help up while we determine what it is.

Finally, please make sure that the codes used in M1020 and M1022 match the information shown in the endocrine status.  Many times we see diabetes as a diagnoses, while in the endocrine status it will show diabetes type I or even uncontrolled diabetes.  So, please make sure to document the correct type as well as all diabetic complications which must be verified by a physician.

P.O.L.S.T. Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment

Monday, August 8th, 2011

Select Data serves home health and hospice agencies throughout the country and the Virgin Islands. One agency, not from a POLST state recently asked that we write an article on POLST as they had seen the abbreviation on the Select Data SmartScribe forms. Their state is considering a move toward the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Paradigm program.

The POLST program is designed to improve the quality of care received by individuals at the end of life. It is designed to effectively communicate patient wishes through physician orders on a highly colored form (usually PINK) so as not to be missed by health care professionals.

What is the Difference Between POLST and Advance Directives?

POLST is a document that clearly states a patient’s end of life wishes and includes physician orders and patient signature. Advance Directives generally contain information about a person’s desire to be mechanically ventilated, artificially fed, and comfort measures. Advance Directives will not actively protect against unwanted emergency care, resuscitation specifics, or a transfer to an acute care setting. POLST includes CPR wishes, artificial nutrition choices, and specific statements identifying if a transfer to a hospital is desired. POLST has physician orders to back up the patient’s wishes.

History of the POLST Paradigm Initiative

Despite advance directives, medical ethics leaders recognized that patient wishes for life-sustaining treatments were not consistently being honored. In 1991, in Oregon, the POLST Paradigm Initiative was begun.  The Medical Treatment Coversheet, designed to transport portable medical orders based upon the patient’s wishes emerged from the Initiative lead by The Center for Ethics in Health Care at Oregon Health and Science University. With stakeholders from several health care organizations, the Center coordinated the training of health care professionals regarding use of the form.

In 1995, the name of the Initiative was changed to Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment and the form was released for full use in Oregon. As the program satisfaction grew, other states sought legislation to initiate the program. West Virginia and New York were forerunners in program adoption and they lead the way in learning to integrate the new program within state specific laws.

Presently,(per www.obsu.edu/polst ), the Medical Treatment Coversheet is used by over 95% of nursing homes in Oregon and used by all hospices. It is considered “the accepted medical standard of care.” Together, with Oregon members, program leaders of New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Wisconsin joined together forming the original National POLST Paradigm Initiative Task Force. That Task Force has been instrumental in driving POLST Program development in California, Washington, Idaho, Colorado, Tennessee, and Virginia with several other states, such as Texas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Alaska, and Ohio actively developing programs.

The National POLST Paradigm Task Force (NPPTF): Program Requirements

The Task Force developed the description of the program with specific program requirements. The Program Structure requires an “effective statewide or regional coalition” working on a strategy to establish statewide implementation.

The Program requires a set of medical orders on the Medical Treatment Coversheet. There must be ongoing training of health care professionals at all levels, that includes an understanding of the POLST Program, its goals, use of the Form, as well as understanding “how to conduct a POLST conversation.” (www.obsu.edu/polst)

The Medical Treatment Coversheet includes physician signature. The patient signature is encouraged to be on the completed form as well which includes informed consent and shared medical decision making. The program requires a mechanism for ongoing evaluation and its processes. In addition, there must be a single “strong entity” within the state or region that accepts responsibility and ownership for the Program.

The Form and it’s Requirements

Treatment provided requires a specific medical order based upon the patient’s goals of care and their preferences. POLST offers three choices. First, Comfort Measures Only means care that would relieve pain and suffering. The medical orders “explicitly state in the medical orders that comfort measures are always provided.” (www.polst.com ) The patient is to be transferred if “comfort needs” cannot be provided. Second, the choice is “Limited Additional Interventions” that offer comfort measures as well as IV fluids and antibiotics. This option includes a choice to be transferred to an acute care setting only if suffering could not be relieved at home. The third choice is that of “Full Treatment” and includes the Comfort Measures, IV Fluids and antibiotic interventions as well as CPR and intensive care if needed. The orders must be signed and dated.

To protect the patient’s wishes PRIOR to emergency intervention, requires POLST. For more information regarding this subject, go to www.POLST.com or www.ohsu.edu/polst

The Form must provide explicit direction as to resuscitation as well as patient preferences if they become pulseless or apneic. The Form must also include what the patient does NOT want including ICU, acute care, long term care, etc.

The Form must include the state of coverage. It is to be transportable so the patient may carry the Form within a state or region. The Form also clearly identifies a transfer option in case a patient’s comfort measures cannot be maintained in the present setting.

Educational Videos: Face-To-Face Encounter

Monday, July 25th, 2011

Face To Face Encounters CY2011 Clinical Compliance

CMS was mandated by the Affordable Care Act to provide this encounter. You will be able to look on page 296 on the Final Rule to read the depth of it. But, essentially what CMS is stating is that the physician must see the patient within 90 days prior to the admission in a home health agency.  And that means that also, in seeing that patient for that face-to-face encounter, that diagnosis or that reason for seeing that patient must be directly related to the home health referral.  Now, if they don’t see them within 90 days prior to they must see them within 30 days after admission.

As of December 10, 2010 CMS is sending out a notice to the physician regarding this face-to-face encounter information.  So the home health agencies are going to have to do a lot of education with physicians.  It also requires then, that the physician provide this attestation that they have completed this face-to-face encounter, and it has to be attached to/or a part of the POC.

At Select Data we’ve created a documentation of the face-to-face encounter tool click here to download a copy of this form:  http://www.selectdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/DocumentationFacetoFaceEncounter.pdf

Summary

The face to face encounter must occur within the 90 days prior to the start of care, or within the 30 days after the start of care. While the long standing requirement for physicians to order and certify the need for home health remains unchanged, this new requirement assures that the physician’s order is based on current knowledge of the patient’s condition

Educational Videos: Open Wound As A Primary Diagnosis

Monday, July 25th, 2011

Coding Compliance Open Wounds as a Primary Diagnosis

Open Wound as a Primary Diagnosis

Often we see the term open wound used as a diagnosis, especially as a primary diagnosis.  This is a vague term and should be avoided, because it will need clarification before it can be coded.  Did you know that an open wound can be referred to 10 or more different types of wounds?  And each one of these wounds has a different code or codes.

Some of these different wounds are:

  • Decubitus Ulcer
  • Diabetic Ulcer
  • Venous Stasis Ulcer
  • Normally Healing Surgical Wound
  • Post-Op Wound Infection
  • Dehisced Surgical Wound
  • Traumatic Wound
  • Burn
  • Chronic Skin Ulcer
  • Abscess

Each one of these requires as different code.  This stops the coding process until the nature and the origin and the location of the wound can be identified.  All these variables change the code or codes assigned.

Trauma wounds are caused by an outside trauma to the body and they include:

  • Gun shots
  • Avulsions
  • Lacerations
  • Punctures
  • Not surgical

Surgical wounds are never coded as a traumatic wound.  A superficial traumatic wound is not a full thickness wound and this includes:

  • Skin tears
  • Abrasions
  • Blisters

Skin tear is not coded as a traumatic wound unless it is exceptionally large or the skin flap has been lost.  Remember when you’re tempted to write open wound on that diagnosis line, please stop and consider specifically what kind of wound is this and where is its location, and put that information on the diagnosis line instead.