Archive for the ‘Surveys’ Category

Some Important Sites for Providers of Home Health Services

Friday, September 21st, 2012

In this day when the only constant is change, here are a few important sites to add to your list.

MLN Matters Articles Index thru August 2012

An excellent site housing national articles designed to inform providers about the latest changes in the industry.

It includes links to MLN related information and over 50 products relating to DME, EHR, Education and Management, Medicare Payment Policy, Provider Compliance, and Provider Specific Information.

www.CMS.gov/outreachandeducation

Patient Centered Medical Home Model

CMS is still testing the patient centered medical home model in the multi-player Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration and the Federally Qualified Health Centers Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration.

CMS continues to test the PCMH model under the Innovation Center created by Section 3021 of the Affordable Care Act allowing CMS the opportunity to test a variety of models and expand implementation throughout the country.

http://innovations.cms.gov/

The Innovation Center

The Center was created by Section 3021 of the Affordable Care Act allowing the opportunity to test a variety of models and expand implementation throughout the country, the goal is to increase quality and reduce health care expenditures through innovation.

http://innovations.cms.gov/

Survey Guidelines

www.cms/surveycertificationinfo.gov/downloads

Preventing Billing Errors

To increase Understanding of billing requirements and to avoid common billing errors, visit

www.cms.gov/outreachandeducation

Claims Processing

To review expectations for proper claims processing, go to

www.cms/outreachandeducation

The Official Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 22- Remittance Advice

http://www.cms.gov/manuals/downloadsclm104c22.pdf

Understanding the Remittance Advice:

A Guide for Medicare Providers, Physicians, Suppliers, and Billers

http://www.cms.gov/inproductsdownloads/RA_Guide_Full_2_22_06.pdf

Therapy Claims-Based Data Collection Strategy

Proposed rule CMS 1590-P was released as a proposal to collect more date on patient function as it relates to Speech/ language, occupational, and physical therapy services delivered. The Middle Class Tax Relief and Jobs creation Act (MCTRJCA) requires CMS to begin this data collection January 1, 2013.

Update on ACOs

We have written several blogs and ezines regarding the new Chronic Care Management Models, including Accountable Care Organizations. Health and Human Services Secretary announced that as of mid summer there are 89 new ACOs in 40 states serving 1.2 million people. As we have discussed in prior ezinesin both 2011 and 2012. ACOs may be formed by health care groups (not home health agencies) such as hospitals and physician groups. New applications continue to be accepted and there is expectation of the formation of many more of the alternative

care models. Go to:

http://www.hhs.gov/news

Remember, the CMS website has had new updates re Open Door Forum Discussions and MLN educational updates as well as content re ICD-10. Visit often as regulations are changing and being updated routinely.

Billing Compliance and Proposed Survey Sanction: Two Looming Issues for the Home Health Industry

Thursday, September 13th, 2012

Issue One: Looking at Statistical  Data

Every time an OASIS is submitted to the state, portions of it may be parsed out to state, regional, and Federal groups such as the HEAT, MAC review groups, and Federal special projects in the DOJ and FBI. That means that when a review letter arrives, it may already be too late. Since we are aware that Predictive Analytics are employed, correct complete data must be submitted.

Predictive Analytics

In home health care, predictive models are being used to exploit patterns found in historical and transactional data to identify risks and opportunities. The present Models capture relationships among many factors to allow assessment of risk or potential risk associated with a particular set of conditions. The relationships should guide clinicians in their care plan decisions as well as care delivery. There are thousands upon thousands of potential OASIS and coding combinations. Because of the patient profiles and patterns retained over the years, comparisons can be made readily. Add HHRGs and service information to the OASIS and diagnostic data and CMS can gather very significant data regarding your agency’s care delivery and outcomes. MANY analytic filters are utilized to screen the data.  The initial round of filters are termed MUEs (Medically Unbelievable Edits). These edits are the first predictors of fraud and can alert the Z-PICs of agencies that should be monitored. Auditors may monitor an agency for years, gathering data, analyzing data and patterns, andreviewing payments. The agency profile is completed.

This data and these pre-probe edits allow Z-PICs to have plenty of time to analyze data and monitor agency behaviors so that when they send a letter, they have already completed their initial audit and arrived at a solid conclusion. 

Since experts state that 75-85% of all agencies are acutely unaware of business operations data and do not have necessary compliance rules built into or a part of their billing practices to protect them from wrongful claim submission, agencies are at risk. Who is auditing your clinical records and care, the ICD-9 coding, and the claim submission? Who is monitoring your data? Do you have clinical and operational benchmarks? In 2009, billing errors were found to have doubled. Be proactive now, because if your compliance rules and program are weak, you could be hearing from the Z-PICs soon.

Issue Two: Look at Clinical Data

CMS has proposed strong regulations establishing hefty intermediate sanctions to be imposed on home health agencies not in compliance with CoPs. Agencies must read the survey regulations carefully, implement precise policies and procedures, and audit utilization of those policies and procedures to be certain they meet processes as intended by the agency compliance program.

Proposed provisions include:

Monetary sanctions of $8500.00-$10,000.00 for condition level deficiencies that place a patient in immediate jeopardy.

Fines of $8500.00 per day for repeat deficiencies

Fines of $2500.00-$5000.00 per day for other deficiencies not placing a patient in jeopardy.

The monetary sanctions can be applied for the number of days the agency is out of compliance and they can be increased or decreased after the application of the penalty. The sanctions may be per day or per instance. They could not be applied simultaneously for the same deficiency. Please go to the CMS website to review the proposed rule.

Monetary sanctions are not the only sanctions that CMS may impose. CMS can chooses to terminate a provider agreement.  If an agency is unable or unwilling to correct deficiencies. Additional alternative or additional sanctions include suspension of payments for new admissions and new episodes of care, temporary management of care, mandated directed inservices and training, as well as the  emporary management of deficient agencies including making personnel changes and providing necessary interventions to assist the agency back into compliance.

The proposed rules would place much more pressure on a home health agency requiring  excellent documentation of care following a careplan that is consistent with  the needs identified in the patient clinical assessment. If outcomes are not achieved because needs were not appropriately identified, visits were missed, or care was not appropriately delivered, or a patient was placed in danger, an agency could face sanctions.

Agencies are expected to audit care, audit data, audit employee performance and be attuned to levels of care delivered to the patients of the agency. Agencies must clearly accept responsibility for care delivery and the outcomes derived from that care. It is clear from the proposed rule that

If the proposed survey sanctions are passed, agencies must be concerned they have excellent processes in place such as a “built-in, self regulating quality assessment and performance improvement system to provide proper care, prevent poor outcomes, control patient injury, enhance quality, promote safety, and avoid risks to patients on a sustainable basis that indicates the ability to meet theCoPs and to ensure patient health and safety ( Fed Register Vol 77 #135, Friday, 7/13/2012 Proposed  Rules, p 41582 col 3). or the financial consequences could be devastating.

The RACs are Coming… The RACs are Coming… And Coding is a Target

Tuesday, January 31st, 2012

RACs have recovered over 96% of all audited claims resulting in take-backs of over 2 billion dollars. Is it any wonder that the home health industry is concerned about their new focus in our industry? The RACs have been identified. The MACs, who will work with the RACs are all now in place.

RACs are contingency based, so, they are motivated to seek out variances.  They can audit 1% of the average monthly Medicare episodes of care (maximum 200) every 45 days per NPI.

Home Health agencies should anticipate to see audits of outlier payments for insulin injections. They should expect, based on coding algorithms to see records reviewed. Are you monitoring your coding and documentation closely? Expect audits.  Fiscal Intermediaries have identified reasons for claim denials and identified high risk areas for non-compliance. Those targeted areas include areas involving coding, homebound status, the documentation of the skilled services delivered, and the overall medical necessity of care administered.

Agencies should be cautious that the codes affixed are well supported by the documentation of the clinician. Too frequently, there has been partial denial of therapy resulting in medical review down-code. Too often and easily, FIs have found clinical documentation incongruent with OASIS M items. Too many times, the reviewers have found that the documentation does not support the focus of care, the sequence for coding, or the medical necessity of the skilled services billed.

In the RAC demonstration project, 35% of the findings pertained to coding. Expect Home Health coding to become one of the chief areas of focus. Remember, the RACs will be looking at variance which will allow them to view consistency of a client’s OASIS, coding, clinical documentation, and the plan of care.

The RAC attack: how to prepare and manage the audits

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid  (CMS) has implemented, in home health, the  audit process that has proven successful in other areas of the health care industry.  The RAC auditors have been authorized to recover “improper payments “of preapproved areas of risk.  In the demonstration project, high areas of risk included incorrectly coded records, therapy appropriateness, and medically unnecessary services. The RACS use public information from the Office of Inspector General (OIG) and the General Accounting Office (GAO) to focus improper payment audits.

RACs have recovered over 96% of all audited claims resulting in high take-back dollars. Is it any wonder that the home health industry is concerned about their new focus?

RACs are contingency based, so, they are motivated to seek out variances.  They can audit 1% of the average monthly Medicare episodes of care (maximum 200) every 45 days per NPI.  The question is: what action should the home health agency consider now?

Choose a RAC Leader and RAC Response Team

First of all, agencies should appoint a RAC Team Leader who will identify the single point of contact and establish a RAC Response Team. This dynamic team should represent the components of the clinically driven revenue cycle management (RCM) process. Specifically, 1) physicians and clinicians;, nurses, therapists, social workers, 2) quality improvement and documentation specialists, 3) casemanagers, 4) coders, 5) HIM, 6) chargemaster/billing/RCM specialists, 7)  data analysts, 8) Education/Training Specialists, 9) corporate compliance, 10) legal, 11) department heads, 12) mitigation sub-committee that will actually analyze and track each RAC record , and others will be called as needed.  This team will need to address both past and present tactical and oversight issues while prioritizing areas of risk. Additionally, they will review the agency’s ability to complete processes, including audits, and tracking the appeal response.

RAC audits represent significant risk to revenues, profit margins, and workflow stability.  The education of the RAC Response Team is vital in developing the most thorough, yet, efficient approach to establishing RAC risk review and protocol preparedness. Have the team ready.

Identify Vulnerabilities

RAC Response Team education should include lessons learned from the home health industry past: Operation Restore Trust (ORT), May 1995, a two year project in five states resulting in $187.5 million in fines, recoveries, and civil money penalties.  After four years, ORT was credited with a 45% decrease in improper payments, recovery of over $524 million in judgments and settlements and prevention of nearly $11 billion paid in inappropriate claims.

In general, ORT found issues with medical necessity, lack of homebound status, and lack of documentation to support care provided.  Sound familiar? ORT targeted agencies by volume of claims, frequency of medical review issues, LUPA episodes, outliers, therapy thresholds, as well as medical necessity determinations and coding errors.

The recent RAC demonstration results reflected similar focus areas. Agencies should heed those trends identified.

The RAC Response Team should become familiar with regulatory requirements and timeliness. Inservices as well as FAQ sheets with key regulatory highlights and a list of appropriate links to review could be provided. The leader should become familiar with the RAC website as well as monitor the CMS website, alerts, and transmittals.

The RAC Demonstration project showed a 7% payment recovery because of inadequate response to medical record requests so, a process will be needed, to mitigate information flow and manage RAC audit activities thus, create the RAC mitigation sub-committee. This committee or team should function as a subsection of the RAC Response Team, aiding the RAC Team Leader in tracking claims under review.

Identify the patient and document flow, identifying tasks and tools. Diagram patient care flow from intake > admission> medication profile review> discipline specific careplan development > coding >  plan of care development > RAP drop> discipline visits > outcome achievement> QA process review >to final claim submission and A/R management.

Retrospective chart audits as well as present processes and concurrent chart audits should be completed to identify risk. The RAC Response team may decide to contract with third party specialists for comprehensive consulting services to assist the team. The services can include:

  • ICD-9-CM Coding Review (Soon to be ICD-10 CM)
  • Documentation adequacy to substantiate the Plan of Care and the Codes
  • Billing and Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) Review
  • Process and Workflow Analysis
  • Clinical and RCM Resource
  • Presenting OASIS C and Evidenced-Based Practice correlations
  • Conducting RAC training sessions to prepare identified personnel for audits

Comprehensive third party clinical/RCM review of care delivered can assign potential organization susceptibility.  The chart audits can distinguish:

  • If the admission was medically necessary and the plan appropriate and covered all disciplines.
  • If the clinical visits support the plan and the notes
  • If the coding met convention and had adequate documented support
    • Focus on case mix diagnoses
    • Review diagnoses sequencing
  • If therapy, treatment and procedures were appropriate
  • If the reason qualifying homebound status was documented each visit and used objective measureable language
  • Other criteria mutually identified by the RAC Response Team and the outside specialists

The RAC Team should consider reviewing the agency overall compliance process, keeping basic CMS regulations in mind.

There have been no limits placed upon the number of sixty day episodes per beneficiary as long as they remain eligible for the home health benefit.  Payment is adjusted to the patient’s need. It becomes the home health agency’s responsibility to assess the patient accurately. Based upon answers to OASIS items describing the patient’s condition and projected therapy needs, a case-mix adjustment is determined. It is the agency’s responsibility to be certain the assessment is accurate, the care is appropriate, and expected outcomes are achieved. Congruency is a key.

Though no limits have been placed on the number of episodes, the Medicare home health benefit is intended to address short term medical needs designed to be met within 60 days. Ongoing recertification is meant to be the exception, not the norm. That recertification must be signed and dated and have backup support of clinical visit and progress notes, copies of summary reports sent to the physicians, and discharge planning. 42 C.F.R. 484.48.  Sometimes, agencies forget that recertification episodes must be clearly justified and are being reviewed carefully. The RAC Team may wish to call for an audit of patients with two episodes and higher.

Expect recertification assessments to become a focus of review.

Because, the RAC audits have focused on medical necessity, it is vital that the intake process and admission policies be reviewed to ensure compliance.  Involve case managers to discuss how they determine projected visit numbers as well as reconcile their careplan focused visits to the Plan of Care. That Plan of Care is the physician ordered medical certification substantiating the need for home health services. 42 C.F.R. 409.43(c) (3).

The coding processes have historically been one of the highest targeted areas of concern because of inaccurate coding in relation to the assessment and documentation submitted. Improper sequencing of codes with incongruence between assessment and plan of care create chart concerns. Chargemaster functions are to be reviewed to determine how identified problems are corrected. Consider third party coders or third party billing sources who know the rules and assist you to remain compliant.

Billing processes are diverse and should be order centric. A record and process review is necessary to map out areas of high risk, such as physician orders and signatures reconciled prior to final claims dropped. Timeliness requirements should be noted when the process is diagrammed.  Billing can become complex when changes and corrections must be made, so a clear tracking process must be maintained. Personnel must be kept current in billing code changes and CMS requirements.

Anytime adjustments or corrections must be made to the billing, there is a risk for duplicate billing. A strong, consistently reviewed process is needed to track beneficiary eligibility, routine billing requirements, billing adjustments, timeliness, and order centricity.  This review process will go a long way toward preventing automated audits. Remember, the automated audits are intended to locate the simple errors.

The Complex reviews are seeking errors that require more intense review; through medical record reviews.  If a RAC demand letter should arrive, the agency may wish to use that informal discussion period, to discuss the RAC’s reason for the repayment. The agency

You should discuss with the RAC auditor how they can submit supportive documentation. If the RAC agrees to see additional information, they can stop the recoupment process If they do not agree the agency can continue with the appeal process.

Providers/agencies have 120 days (from the date on the demand letter) to file an appeal.  This appeal can halt recoupment but, without a valid appeal, recoupment starts on day 41 per CMS.  Appeal prevention oriented agencies need strong process review and implementation. They need to start their own review now.

Coding and Documentation. Coding and Documentation. Coding and Documentation. They just keep becoming more and more important!

The New Survey Protocols: Are You Ready or How Did You Do?

Tuesday, January 31st, 2012

The CMS new survey protocols have been in effect for over six months. The revised Home Health Agency Survey Protocols and New State Operations Manual are available online. The new survey process is data-driven and patient outcome-oriented with a focus on patient visits and personnel interviews. Though it appears less structured, it is very process-driven.

The new tiered system directs surveyors to focus on quality of care. A detailed list of surveyor probes are provided, outlining questions that may be asked throughout the survey process. Agencies should review the questions outlined for surveyors in order to prepare for the survey process. Preparation for this process will reinforce other patient focused processes. Are you ready? Visit www.cms.gov/Surveycertificationgeninfo/downloads/SCLetter11_11.pdf to read more.

CMS stated surveyors would cite more deficiencies under the new process. After one year, it will be interesting to view the stats.

The Key Focus Areas

Patient Rights

Assessments

Plan of Care

Outcomes and Improvement

Infection Control

The survey process is guided by interpretive guidelines and survey protocols established to provide guidance for surveyors. The surveyor will review the assessment, the medication profile, and physician orders and then evaluate the established plan of care with review of that implementation of the plan of care. Patient and personnel interviews should support the findings of the clinical record.  Prepare personnel for survey interviews so they are familiar with terminology and types of questions they may be asked. Support the interviewees by having them understand that they are the experts in care delivery. They are merely verbalizing the assessment, the care, and the outcomes expected or achieved.

All surveyors are required, by CMS, to utilize these guidelines when evaluating an agency as to compliance with Federal regulation. Remember, the guidelines do not replace regulation and are not allowed to be the basis of any citation, but they provide guidance.  Violations are to be based upon clinical record reviews, interviews with patients, caregivers, and personnel, as well as the agency’s practices in relationship to regulation and agency policies.

“The survey and certification process provides a method for CMS to evaluate HHA compliance with the Conditions of Participation (CoPs), ensuring that patient services provided meet minimum health and safety standards and a basic level of quality. The HHA survey process incorporates an approach that is patient-focused, outcome-oriented and data-driven making it more efficient and effective in assessing, monitoring, and evaluating the quality of care delivered by an HHA…” (Appendix B, p.6).

The surveys are required to have at least one RN on the team.  Surveyors are required to attend the HHA Training Course prior to any survey. They are then required to be in an observational role as part of the training.

Preparing for the Survey

Appoint at least one person, in your agency, to become very familiar with the new survey process. You may want that person to be OASIS certified to readily discuss OASIS conventions. Develop a thorough process-oriented clinical orientation. Be certain all policies and procedures are current and personnel have had the appropriate inservices.

Have a third party or internal coding expert available to answer any questions regarding diagnoses coding conventions, manifestations, and sequencing. A coding audit by an external review agency may give you some peace of mind.

Be certain your clinical lead has reviewed and audited Starts of Care, Resumptions of Care, Recertifications, and Discharges. Be certain the assessments are well documented and the care plans adequately support that proposed Plan of Care.

Be certain the billing (revenue cycle management) audits include the compliance processes that prevent inappropriate billing without a physician order and evidence of all detailed and signed visit notes.

Types of Surveys

The survey process provides for a standard survey, a partial extended survey, and an extended survey. All HHAs must undergo a standard survey.

Initial Certification

The initial certification requires compliance with SS Act 1861(0) (4) as well as 2180 regarding licensing requirements. In addition, follow the guidelines of SS2008 “Early Surveys of New Providers and Suppliers”.

The State Agency (SA) surveyor or the National Accrediting Organization (AO) inclusive of Joint Commission, CHAP, or ACHC with deeming authority conducts the initial certification. At the time of that survey, the HHA must

  • Be operational and have completed the Medicare Enrollment 855A verified by the assigned MAC.
  • Provide nursing and one other therapeutic service (42 CFR 484.14(a).
  • Meet the new capitalization requirements and have completed an OASIS test submission.
  • Have provided care to a minimum of 10 patients requiring SKILLED care.

Standard Survey

This survey is to be a review of the quality of care and services furnished by the HHA as measured by the medical, nursing, and rehabilitative care indicators. The new changes require this survey to review compliance with regulations most related to high-quality patient care. These highest priority standards (regulations) are called Level 1 standards addressing 9 of the 15 CoPs. The thinking is that if the agency is in compliance with these standards, it is in compliance with all CoPs.

Therefore,  “the surveyor can make a determination  that the HHA is in compliance with all CoPs when, after a review of the Level 1 standards, and after completing the required clinical record reviews, home visits, and interviews with patients and HHA staff, he/she does not discover any findings which would support a deficiency citation.”

Partial Extended Survey

This survey occurs when a standard level survey identifies a non compliant Level 1 standard and/or a deficiency practice may exist at a standard or conditional level not examined at the standard survey.  During this survey, the surveyor reviews at a minimum, the Level 2 standards under the same condition which are related to the non compliant Level 1 standards. See Table 1 Level 1 and Level 2 Standards.

Extended Survey

This survey includes a review of all conditions. It may be conducted at any time at the discretion of CMS and is required to be conducted when any conditional level deficiency is identified. The surveyor is required to review all agency policies, procedures, and practices related to the substandard care (one or more condition –level deficiencies).

Recertification Survey

All HHAs are mandated (SS1891) to have a recertification performed no later than 36 months from a previous recertification survey. These surveys are standard unless a Level 1 citation is leveled.

Now, you know the types of surveys. The following chart lists the standard and partially extended surveys with their related priority standards and G-tags. The more you know about the new process, the better prepared you will be for your next survey.

Level 1 and Level 2 Standards Appendix B

Table 1

Conditions                            Standard Survey                Partial Extended Survey

Level 1                                   Level 2

484.10

Patient Rights                          G107, G109                             G101, G108, G111, G114

484.12

Compliance with                     G121                                        G118

Federal, State, Local

Laws

484.14 Organization,               G123, G133, G143,                 G124, G125, G127, G138,

Services and                             G144                                       G139, G150

Administration

484.18 Acceptance                 G157, G158, G159                      G160, G162, G163

Of Patients, Plan of Care,       G164, G165, G166

Medical Supervision

484.30 Skilled                          G170, G172, G173,                     G169, G179

Nursing Services                     G174, G175, G176,

G177

484.32 Therapy                        G186, G187, G188                      G190, G193

484.36 Home Health Aide      G224, G229                               G212, G215, G225, G226, G230

Services                                                                                     G232

484.48 Clinical Records          G236                                        G239

484.55 Comprehensive          G331, G332, G334,                  G339, G341

Assessment of Patients          G445, G336, G337,

G338, G340

Compliance Q&A: Survey protocols, CoPs, HIPAA, ACOs, and Transitions of Care

Saturday, November 19th, 2011

Questions regarding 2011 Survey protocols

Q. We have several questions re the new survey protocols. What are some of the key differences? What does the pre-survey preparation include?

A. The new survey protocols focus on specific standards within identified conditions that are related to quality care. To identify the care delivered and its relationship to the assessment and plan of care designed, besides reviewing the clinical record, the surveyor will also rely on personnel interviews as well as home visits. The survey is data-driven, patient-focused, and outcome-oriented.

The surveyor is expected to collect data and review State file data, prior survey results, OASIS reports, and agency specific characteristics. (S)he will review outcomes, potentially avoidable events of both active and discharged patients, and make visits for higher risk patents. The new protocols provide specific guidance on citing standard and condition-level deficiencies.

Q. Can you explain the survey levels? How is a standard survey extended?

A. A Standard Survey focuses on Level 1 standards (9 of 15 CoPs) which focus on the delivery of high quality patient care using not only clinical records but inclusive of interviews. If the home health agency is in compliance with all Level 1 standards and there are no identified concerns requiring investigation, the survey will be concluded and form CMS 2567 is issued.

Partial Extended Survey begins/expands when expected outcomes are not met for one or more Level 1 Standards. It requires a review of Level 2 standards. It should be expected that related information would be sought for areas of concern such as agency policies and procedures, personnel competency evaluations, and inservice training

Condition-Level Deficiencies can occur with serious findings related to or not related to Level 1 and 2 standards. Immediate patient jeopardy is always cited at the condition level. All conditions are reviewed.  Refer to the State Operations Manual, Appendix B Guidelines.

Questions re CoPs

Q. What are the required leadership positions stated in the CoPs?

A. The Conditions of Participation cite three administrative positions:  a governing body, an administrator, and a supervising physician or RN.  You may title these three positions whatever  your agency prefers, however the positions must exist and the individuals appointed must perform the duties identified in the CoPs. Be certain job descriptions, policies and procedures, and other necessary documentation clearly define that the positions perform all required designated responsibilities.

Do not forget the delegates required. Be certain that agency policy identifies who will function as the administrative delegate. The agency must also be in compliance with state requirements, which frequently are more stringent. Compare both State and Federal requirements so the agency is in compliance.

Q. Is it true that we must have a realistic end point for intermittent services for a patient who has a chronic diagnosis, such as Alzheimer’s disease?
A.The CMS Publication 100-2, Chapter 7, § 40.1.1,  states  services can be provided “without regard to whether the illness or injury is acute, chronic, terminal, or expected to extend over a long period of time.”

According to the publication, if the patient with a chronic disease is homebound and needs skilled, reasonable, and necessary services that meet the part-time or intermittent requirements, then the agency can provide care.  That documentation must carefully be documented, The agency must be certain there exists an intensive assessment of the patient and their support services with interventions and goals clearly stated.  Carefully delineate the SKILLED need for each visit made. If the patient with Alzheimer’s disease qualifies for Medicare coverage through a need for monthly catheter changes and receives home health aide services 1x per mon, be certain each visit shows progress and document pt/cg response to care.

Up to a maximum of 28 hours per week of skilled nursing care and home health aide services combined completed in less than 8 hours per day or up to 35 hours per week of skilled nursing and home health aide services and subject to review by the fiscal intermediary. Medicare requires supporting evidence of the continued skilled care need. The agency must reflect the need for compliant skilled care through clear documentation.

Questions about ACOs and New Payment Methods

Q. I am hearing about bundled services. Should I be concerned?

A. Home Health Agencies should be aware of potential ACO formation in their respective markets.  Does your agency have a specialty you should be marketing to local hospitals? Some hospitals are looking at the bundled payment options as well as ACOs. Read more at the CMS website but know that the proposed pilot gives participants the opportunities to make choices regarding patients to include, length of episodes of care, whether acute inpatient care should be included, and the target payment to be established. There are a variety of proposed models. Go to www.CMS.hhs.gov to learn more.

Q. I have heard there will be new payment methods. What are they?

A. Select Data will be providing ezine articles in late November and December regarding some of the proposed payment and treatment methods being considered and presently being evaluated. Those may include:

Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) with Bundled Payments or Shared Savings Programs where the ACO shares risk. There will be various types of risk sharing programs. There may be Value- based Payment plans. Expect to see ACOs lead by hospitals or physician groups. Home Health Agencies will need to show value to become a part of such collaborative formalized groups.  Expect CMS to utilize comparative-effectiveness techniques of evidenced-based practices. Become familiar with the following terms:

ACOs: Integration of providers to assume responsibility for the quality, costs, and outcomes of care.

Total Costs of Care: A reimbursable methodology that is being designed to reduce cost by person by episode.

Predictive Modeling: A methodology to estimate how clients may use services and the related costs based upon variables, prior behavior, and attributes assigned.

Transition of Care: The movement of patients from one health care practitioner or setting to another as the condition and care needs change. Under this model, there will be NO discharge summary. Instead expect a “Transition Summary”. See the next Select Data article: CMS and Transitions of Care.

Questions re Face to Face

Q. Is anyone working to get some help for home health agencies regarding the face-to-face rule?

A. Yes, several state associations as well as NAHC are working to obtain some legislative relief. NAHC has called for 1) exemptions in specific hardship circumstances, 2) a reduction in documentation required, 3) expanded use of telehealth to meet the face to face requirement, 4) protection of home health agencies from denials without fault, 4) allow one physician/NPP to complete the Face to Face and another to certify (CMS has proposed this but is limiting it only to an inpatient physician).

Q. Could you give a summary of key points of the proposed 2012 Home Health PPS Rate Rule?

A. Agencies will need to be efficient as there is a proposed 2.5% inflation update, a 5.06% case mix creep adjustment, and a 3.56% rate reduction for 2012. In addition there is a recalculation of case mix weights proposed that includes elimination of two hypertension codes (401.1 Benign essential hypertension and 401.9 Unspecific essential hypertension). Also, there would be lower therapy episode coding weights. This would include a deceleration of a higher number of visits with a removal of the therapy visit step indicators. There will also be a recalculation of points to clinical and functional scores. Additionally, if an agency failed to complete a successful dry run  in Q3 of 2010 for HHCAHPs, they risk a 2% reduction in payment. (See October, 2011 Select Data ezine for more regarding HHCAHPs).

A few questions regarding HIPAA

Q. Could you give a brief summary of HIPAA HITECH? Can you discuss breach? Can you discuss best practices needed?

A. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 brought changes to HIPAA regulations in three broad areas: breach notifications, business associations, and penalties. It increases enforcement of HIPAA and allocates billions of dollars to invest in the implementation and exchange of health information technology such as the EMR.

Under HITECH, if a breach compromises the privacy and security of the patient’s information and poses a significant risk of financial, reputational, or other harm, patient notification is required.

Five new definitions have been added:

  • Breach Electronic
  • Health Record (HER)
  • National Coordinator
  • Personal Health Record (PHR)
  • Vendor Of PHI

HITECH strengthens the specifics of privacy, significantly increasing penalties, establishing a heightened enforcement scheme and giving state attorney general enforcement authority. Individuals may now be held accountable for wrongful disclosure (HITECH Act section 13409).

If a breach involves 500 or more individuals, the department of HHS should be immediately notified. DHHS began posting names on March 1, 2010. Breaches below 500 must be logged and annually sent to DHHS.

For Business Associates, the Covered Entity must ensure that BAs have implemented the administrative, physical, and technical safeguards of HIPAA security. The CE must also specify that the BA must comply with use and disclosure rules in the HIPPA Privacy Rule. The BA should demonstrate how they will negotiate security/data breach coordination. There should also be an agreement on reporting and dispute resolution.

If the health care organization suspects or knows that a BA has committed a material breach or violation of the agreement, “the health care organization is in violation of the business associate rules unless it takes reasonable steps to cure the breach or end the violation {45CFR 164.504 (e)(1)(ii)” (Decision Health, HIPAA, 2010).

Penalties include a Tiered System for assessing both the level and penalty for each violation. There is a cap of $50,000 per violation and 1.5 million for the calendar year for the same type of violation.

Health care organizations should have in place policies that address various levels of violation, such as failing to sign off a computer terminal when not attended, sharing passwords, assessing a patient record without legitimate reason, releasing data for personal gain, and intentionally destroying or altering data.

Use Best Practices for:

Authentication: pre-boot and intricate passwords

Access: Need to know basis on approved devices

Retention: Destroy if not needed

Encryption: Laptops, notebooks, desktops, email, and social networks

For some peace of mind, have a written information security program, an active HIPAA privacy program, and a living Corporate Compliance Program.