Archive for March, 2011

Part 3: The Entrance Interview and Information Gathering

Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

CMS states that survey protocols promote consistency in the survey process. The goal is to assure that a “facility’s compliance with regulation is reviewed in a thorough, efficient, and consistent manner…” The protocols also state:

“Surveyors gather critical information by focusing on home visits, interviews, and clinical record reviews.”During the standard survey, activities are to focus on Level 1 standards unless issues are found.

The entrance interview (Surveyor Task 2) sets the tone for the entire survey and CMS views this as a critical first stage of the onsite visit. Upon arrival, expect the surveyor to introduce herself, display identification, and to identify to the administrator, director, or supervisor the purpose of the survey and the number of expected days to conclude the process. On the survey team, CMS states, there should be a RN with home health experience.

Expect the surveyor (team) to:

  • Ask who will be attending the entrance survey.
  • Explain the survey process and the anticipated days required for completion.
  • Request a current organizational chart and discuss lines of authority, as well as delegation of responsibility and services provided (directly and by arrangement).
  • Request explanation of relationship to any other corporate structure as well as identifying any branches.
  • Ask for the present census number, scheduled visits for the week, and the number of unduplicated patients admitted receiving skilled services for a recent 12 month period.
  • Ask for a list of all employees as well as all personnel under arrangement.
  • Ask for a list of all key personnel knowledgeable about:
    • Home health aides
    • Inservice trainings offered as well as attendance sheets
    • Clinical supervision processes
    • Key resource to respond to surveyor questions
    • Ask for the process to have unrestricted access to clinical records.
    • Request access to all active patients paid by Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay. Identify the SOC date, primary diagnosis, and services provided. This list will assist to derive the home visit list.
    • Request discharged/closed records for review from agency’s Potentially Avoidable Event Patient Listing report.
    • Identify personnel to interview.

In order to gather the information (Surveyor Task 3) needed for survey compliance with Level 1 standards, the surveyor will be asking questions, completing interviews, and preparing for home visits. Areas that may be explored include:

  • Complaint investigation processes
  • Review of admission packets as to complaint process explanation and patient rights.
  • Ask how agency ensures all personnel and contractors adhere to agency policies and procedures.
  • Ask about any staffing challenges, monitoring of clinical competency, supervision of LPN/LVNs.
  • Ask how agency staffs therapy and how qualified therapists supervise assistants.
  • Ask if home health aides are employees or provided through arrangement.
  • Ask how home health aide supervisory visits are tracked.
  • Ask if physician electronic signatures are accepted and the related policy.
  • Ask how clinical records are maintained. If there are electronic records, ask for the tutorial re accessing records.
  • Ask timeframe for documentation to be turned in by clinicians and monitoring process.
  • Ask re HHA policy for record corrections and for conducting assessments (can therapists complete these per agency policy?).
  • Ask about any issues identified on pre-survey pulled reports.
  • Establish a time to discuss indepthly the drug regimen patient review when therapy completes the assessment; how does the agency deal with drug order differences (what patient is ordered vs what is found in the home).
  • Ask when and how it is determined that an updated comprehensive assessment is needed.
  • Discuss tracking systems, supervisory visits, and due dates for updating comprehensive assessments.

Non-clinical record materials are not reviewed unless problems are identified through HHA staff interviews, patient caregiver interviews, home visits, and clinical records. If problems are found with Level 1 standards, surveyors move to a partial extended survey and evaluate Level 2 standards as necessary. If concerns arise during interview, record reviews or home visits, it may be necessary to include a review of additional material as needed, such as personnel records, contracts, policies and procedures, clinical procedural references, documentation of home health aide training and/ or competency evaluation, documentation of complaint investigation and resolution, CLIA waiver, and/or other materials.”

Interviewing Clinical Manager

The surveyor will be requesting information re assurance of adherence to agency policies, physicians’ orders, patient/client confidentiality, error identification, drug regimen review, and timeliness of assessment completion.

Additionally, expect to dialogue re location (in the clinical record) of documentation of supervisory visits, case conferences, phone calls, medications, and wound care. Expect to be asked, “How do you handle prescriptions from physicians other than the physician responsible for the patient’s home health care?”

The Clinical Manager should be ready to identify clinical and other additional resources available. They should be able to address who is responsible for aide patient care instruction and where it is documented. Is there a copy in the home?

Interviewing Clinicians and Case Managers

Clinicians should expect to answer questions re the process for involving patients and their care givers in their care. They should be able to discuss the communication process involving patient condition as well as discharge planning. “How is the same information shared among the appropriate care providers (including physicians and aides)?” (Appendix B, p.17)

Does the clinician know how to obtain assistance re a difficult clinical issue? How does the clinician ensure the safety and confidentiality of patient records when information is transported for use in the patient’s home? What is the process for making a correction in a clinical record? How do you handle prescriptions from physicians other than the physician responsible for the patient’s home health care?

Notice that similar/same questions are being asked of various personnel levels. Notice that patient care, medications, and physician involvement in patient care is emphasized.

Educational Video: Coding Symptoms Of Disease Process

Wednesday, March 30th, 2011

Coding guild lines state that symptom codes are use only when no diagnosis classifiable or found elsewhere is documented.  In other words, if the specific condition is known, then that condition is coded.  Examples of this is seen frequently in homecare are listing and coding shortness of breath or edema along with CHF.  Only the HF should be coded, edema and shortness of breath are part of the symptomology of CHF.  Another example of inaccurate coding seen in home health is writing and coding joint pain when the patent has diagnosed osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis or other arthopathies.  The pain is integral to the disease process so only the disease is coded.  The Plan-of-Care may have orders and goals to address pain management, disease process teaching and/or safety & activity restrictions.  These will relate to the diagnoses condition, therefore, a list of current symptoms is unnecessary even though the symptoms may be addressed separately in the Plan-of-Care.

Likewise in orthopedic and other surgical conditions, pain is an expected part of the post-operative picture and not coded separately.

If a diagnosis has not been established, the symptoms can be listed and coded in M1010/M1020.  Listing symptoms in M1010 is acceptable since the patient seeks care at the hospital or physicians office for symptoms and a definitive diagnosis may take time to be established.

So to refresh, symptoms of a known diagnosed condition are not to be listed as a diagnosis or coded separately, you must only code the condition that these symptoms relate to.

Coding Compliance Symptoms Of Disease Process

Face To Face

Click to play

CY2011 Changes Part I of III

M1010 OASIS Assessments

Click To Play

Open Wound As Primary DX

Upcoming Events

Come Join Us April 15, 2011

What Every HomeCare Executive Needs to Know about Corporate Compliance and Coding

Educational Seminar

Select Data University

Latest Article

There are New Survey Protocols. Are you ready?

Read more

Get Answers

Talk to an Expert.

Get the answers now. Talk to an expert today.

Call 1-800-332-0555

Part 2: Surveyors Prep for Survey and the New Entrance Interviews

Tuesday, March 29th, 2011

CMS has developed a new survey process for Home Health Agencies that will be effective May 1, 2011. It is data driven, patient outcome-oriented, but according to CMS, is less structured yet very process oriented.

For more detailed information, visit http://www.cms.gov/Surveycertificationgeninfo/downloads/SCLetter11_11.pdf to read the advanced copy.

Under revised survey protocols, agencies will be evaluated on a set of 34 standards, known as Level 1 standards. If the surveyor finds a deficiency on any one of the new highest priority standards, a partial extended survey will be conducted.

During that survey, the agency will be evaluated on 27 Level 2 standards. Both sets of standards fall under the nine conditions of participation. Surveyors must conduct extended surveys of all CoPs when any of the more serious condition level deficiencies are cited. Part 1 of this series outlined each CoP and where the G Tag fell; Level 1 or Level 2.

Many agency leaders are stating that it seems the new survey process has more detailed guidance to reduce surveyor inconsistency.

The survey tasks have been clearly delineated by CMS:

  • Task 1- Pre-Survey Preparation
  • Task 2- Entrance Interview
  • Task 3- Information Gathering
  • Task 4- Information Analysis
  • Task 5- Exit Conference
  • Task 6-Formation of the Statement of Deficiencies

Pre-Survey Preparation

Surveyors will prepare for surveys, more indepthly, using OASIS data, previous survey findings, and complaints filed.  Available OASIS reports can be generated for specific time periods, as requested, from the OASIS Coordinator’s office. These reports include case-mix, potentially avoidable events, risk adjusted outcomes based quality improvement (OBQI) or process measure reports.

OBQM Potentially Avoidable Events Report

Know that before coming to the home health agency, the surveyor will have reviewed the most recent quarter of OASIS data to identify patients with emergent care as a result of a fall at home or emergent care for wound infection or deteriorating wound status. This is a Tier 1 event. There are six Tier 2 Potentially Avoidable Events for consideration. To reach the threshold there must be patients who experienced the event and/or the agency to be surveyed must have a current incidence rate equal to or greater than twice the reference rate (Appendix B p.12)

OBQI Outcome Report

Surveyors will also review the agency’s Risk-adjusted Outcomes Report prior to survey. CMS instructs surveyors : “During the onsite survey, select patient records and home visits that focus on the outcomes identified on the OBQI report meeting the individual investigation thresholds” (Appendix B. p12).  If none of the ten listed outcomes trigger the selection criteria, another outcome should be selected from the OBQI report (that meets the selection criteria).

Patient/Agency Characteristics Report

As part of the pre survey process, the surveyor will look at this report for the same timeframe as the OBQI Outcome Report and focus on acute conditions and home care diagnoses that are statistically significant or are equal to or greater than 15% points higher than the reference rate. The surveyor is to choose up to three diagnoses or conditions that meet the criteria and look at corresponding patient records.

Error Summary Report by HHA

Surveyors will be looking for several inconsistencies and errors, such as  inconsistent M0090 date and incorrect record sequence. The latter error could trigger further record reviews if the HHA’s percent of assessments with this error in or above 10%.

What Can an Agency Do on an Ongoing Basis?

Routinely, agencies should be reviewing the online OASIS reports and identifying areas for improvement. They should show interventions planned and implementation of the plan. The agency should also reflect follow up to implementation. This practice establishes a commitment to Quality Improvement and seeking proactive interventions for areas such as recurring hospital admissions.

Part 3: Entrance Interview

CMS remains detailed as to activities that are to be included in the entrance interview.  This interview sets the tone for the survey process identifying expectations. We will explore those in the next article.

There are New Survey Protocols. Are You Ready? Part 1

Tuesday, March 29th, 2011

(Part 1, the Types of Surveys and Level 1 and Level 2 Citations)

CMS has released a revision of the Home Health Agency Survey Protocols and a New State Operations Manual. The new survey process is data-driven and patient outcome-oriented with less structure yet very process-driven. Surveyor worksheets are presently under development and will be released soon by CMS.

The advanced copy of the surveyor procedures introduces a tiered system that directs surveyors to focus on quality of care vs other operations such as HR files. A detailed list of surveyor probes are provided, outlining questions that may be asked throughout the survey process. Agencies should review the questions outlined for surveyors in order to prepare for the survey process. Preparation for this process will reinforce other patient focused processes. Are you ready? To read more, please visit: www.cms.gov/Surveycertificationgeninfo/downloads/SCLetter11_11.pdf

The survey process is guided by interpretive guidelines and survey protocols established to provide guidance for surveyors. They provide clarity as to intent of the regulations. All surveyors are required, by CMS, to utilize these guidelines when evaluating an agency as to compliance with Federal regulation. Remember, the guidelines do not replace regulation and are not allowed to be the basis of any citation, but they provide guidance.  Violations are to be based upon clinical record reviews, interviews with patients, caregivers, and personnel, as well as the agency’s practices in relationship to regulation and agency policies.

“The survey and certification process provides a method for CMS to evaluate HHA compliance with the Conditions of Participation (CoPs), ensuring that patient services provided meet minimum health and safety standards and a basic level of quality. The HHA survey process incorporates an approach that is patient-focused, outcome-oriented, and data-driven making it more efficient and effective in assessing, monitoring, and evaluating the quality of care delivered by an HHA…” (Appendix B, p.6).

The surveys are required to have at least one RN on the team.  Surveyors are required to attend the HHA Training Course prior to any survey. They are then required to be in an observational role as part of the training.

Types of Surveys

The survey process provides for a standard survey, a partial extended survey, and an extended survey. All HHA must undergo a standard survey.

Initial Certification

The initial certification requires compliance with SS Act1861(0)(4)  as well as 2180 regarding licensing requirements. In addition, follow the guidelines of SS2008 “Early Surveys of New Providers and Suppliers.

The State Agency (SA) surveyor or the National Accrediting Organization (AO) inclusive of Joint Commission, CHAP, or ACHC with deeming authority conducts the initial certification. At the time of that survey, the HHA must

  • Be operational and have completed the Medicare Enrollment 855A verified by the assigned MAC.
  • Provide nursing and one other therapeutic service (42 CFR 484.14(a).
  • Meet the new capitalization requirements and have completed an OASIS test submission.
  • Have provided care to a minimum of 10 patients requiring SKILLED care.

Standard Survey

This survey is to be a review of the quality of care and services furnished by the HHA as measured by the medical, nursing, and rehabilitative care indicators. The new changes require this survey to review compliance with regulations most related to high-quality patient care. These highest  priority standards (regulations)  are called Level 1 standards addressing 9 of the 15CoPs. The thinking is that if the agency is in compliance with these standards, it is in compliance with all CoPs.

Therefore,  “the surveyor can make a determination  that the HHA is in compliance with all CoPs when, after a review of the Level 1 standards, and after completing the required clinical record reviews, home visits, and interviews with patients and HHA staff, he/she does not discover any findings which would support a deficiency citation.”

Partial Extended Survey

This survey occurs when a standard level survey identifies a non compliant Level I standard and/or a deficiency practice may exist at a standard or conditional level not examined at the standard survey.  During this survey, the surveyor reviews at a minimum, the Level 2 standards under the same condition which are related to the non compliant Level 1 standards. See Table 1 Level 1 and Level 2 Standards.

Extended Survey

This survey includes a review of all conditions. It may be conducted at any time at the discretion of CMS  and is required to be conducted when any conditional level deficiency is identified. The surveyor is required to review all agency policies, procedures, and practices related to the substandard care (one or more condition –level deficiencies).

Recertification Survey

All HHAs are mandated (SS1891) to have a recertification performed no later than 36 months from a previous recertification survey. These surveys are standard unless a Level 1 citation is leveled.

Now, you know the types of surveys. The following chart lists the standard and partially extended surveys with their related priority standards. The more you know about the new process, the better prepared you will be for your next survey.

Next segment: Surveyors Prep for Survey, Entrance Interviews, Interview Questions They May Ask of Field Personnel and Clinical Managers. Are You Ready?

Level 1 and Level 2 Standards Appendix B
(revised 2/11/2011)

Table 1

Conditions

Standard Survey

Level 1

Partial Extended Survey

Level 2

484.10 Patient Rights G107, G109 G101, G108, G111, G114
484.12 Compliance with Federal, State. Local Laws G121 G118
484.14 Organization, Services and Administration G123, G133, G143,G144 G124, G125, G127, G138,
484.18 Acceptance of Patients, Plan of Care, Medical Supervision G157, G158, G159, G164, G165, G166 G160, G162, G163
484.30 Skilled Nursing Services G170, G172, G173, G174, G175, G176, G177 G169, G179
484.32 Therapy G186, G187, G188 G190, G193
484.36 Home Health Aide Services G224, G229 G212, G215, G225, G226, G230
484.48 Clinical Records G236 G239
484.55 Comprehensive Assessment of Patients G331, G332, G334,G445, G336, G337, G338, G340 G339, G341

Aggressive New Tools Used to Curb Fraud

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011

Aggressive New Tools Used to Curb Fraud: Testimony of Inspector General Levinson March 9, 2011

Recently, the Inspector General spoke to the Senate regarding the efforts of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) to combat fraud and abuse. He addressed the fact that the majority of health care providers are honest, but there is an aggressive minority “of career criminals and sham providers.”

In FY 2010 the OIG opened 1700 health care fraud investigations. In addition, that FY also saw “more than 900 criminal and civil actions and more than $3 billion in investigative recoveries and $1 billion in audit receivables.”

The health care fraud schemes “commonly” included:

  • Purposely billing for services not provided
  • Purposely billing for services not medically necessary
  • Misreporting costs and data to increase payments
  • Paying or receiving kickbacks
  • Illegal marketing

Perpetrators include street criminals “who believe it safer to steal from Medicare than to traffic illegal drugs” to “Fortune 500 companies that pay kickbacks to physicians in return for referrals.”

Organized Crime

The Inspector General identified increasing infiltration by organized crime. He noted that the government recently charged 73 defendants, involving $163 million with fraudulent billing. The indictments charge members of the Armenian-American organized crime syndicate with the fraudulent billings and “using violence to ensure payments to its leadership.” They are charged with establishing 118 phony clinics in 25 states using stolen physician identities.

The OIG states the schemes to commit fraud are becoming more sophisticated. They also migrate to other states and can become viral.

Waste and Abuse of Taxpayer Dollars

The OIG is identifying no tolerance of the “10.5 percent  of the Medicare fee-for-service claims paid ($34.3 billion) that did not meet program requirements.” The OIG states the claims should not have been paid based on analysis finding “insufficient documentation, miscoded claims, and medically unnecessary services accounting for almost all of these errors.”

The OIG is also concerned that it has overpaid in areas such as DME. Medicare has paid over $17,000.00 for pumps used to treat pressure ulcers when, in reality, the suppliers paid $3,600.

The OIG and Its New Technological Partners

Because of the sophistication of “the criminal activity and complexity of the scams,” the HHS and Department of Justice (DOJ) collaborated with antifraud efforts grounded in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) creating the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control (HCFAC) Program. This has been an escalating aggressive program with a high return on dollars invested.

In 2009, HCFAC spearheaded the most aggressive of all fraud enforcement programs. The HHS Secretary and the Attorney General announced the formation of HEAT: Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team. This team was to build upon the Medicare Strike Force teams that had convicted 116 in South Florida and secured over $186 million in criminal fines. Using a “data driven approach to identify unexplainable billing patterns and investigating these providers for possible fraudulent activity” (Holder, E. May 20, 2009) the team quickly added more sophisticated technology, clinical personnel/program experts,  forensic auditors, top level law enforcement personnel, and data analysts to the strike force. In addition, this team had senior officials from the DOJ and HHS with direct access to Congress.

Because of their success operationally and financially (in FY 2008-2010, for every $1.00 spent the return was $6.80), in 2010, their budget included a 50% increase to funding in excess of $311 million. The industry should be aware!

Last month, strike forces engaged in one of the largest Federal health care fraud takedowns ever. In simultaneous raids in 9 cities, 111 defendants were arrested and charged with over $225 million in false billing. The 111 included doctors, nurses, company owners, and other executives with charges from violating the anti-kickback statute to money laundering and identity theft.

“With the approval of the Attorney General, the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) has established procedures to permit special agents from within the Inspector General Community to work together on operations like the HEAT Strike Forces, thereby maximizing efficiency.” Because of the expertise of the team, they are not just raiding when they suspect an issue, they have months of data analyzed prior to the arrest and are then able to raid, arrest, and initiate payment suspensions.

The key to their incredible success are a series of edits that hone in on aberrant data. The data are monitored and certain changes or new edits are added quarterly. The team, for example, was able to identify that Medicare’s average spending per beneficiary for inhalation drugs was five times higher in south Florida than in the rest of the country and they recently responded.  Improper payments for blood glucose strips led to an edit that monitors overlapping dates of services.

Later, in March 2011, the OIG will release its latest edition of: Compendium of Unimplemented OIG Recommendations. This is a must read to have a better idea of recommendations that may still be implemented.

Enhanced Tools and The Affordable Care Act (ACA)

The ACA strengthens law enforcement activities, encourages more audits, and “encourages greater coordination among Federal agencies” by looking at program and payment vulnerabilities, increasing compliance monitoring, and enhances program oversight. It authorizes more robust screening processes for new providers, allows temporary enrollment moratoria when the Secretary learns of fraud “hot spots”, provides for enhanced payment oversight as needed and is mandating compliance programs.

The ACA sanctions “enhanced authority to suspend payments for credible allegations of fraud.”  There have been important “changes to the False Claims Act, the Federal anti-kickback statute, OIG’s administrative authorities, and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines which will help the government to more effectively prosecute those who defraud or abuse Federal health care programs.” Program exclusions will now be used more; not allowing convicted individuals to participate in a Medicare program for a specific number of years and monitoring to be certain they are not violating the exclusion by working with family members in a Medicare program. The OIG has also stated the exclusions will be used with executives of larger organizations.

The OIG has web site guidance used to evaluate whether a section of the exclusion should be imposed. To read more, visit http://oig.hhs.gov . This site also identifies ways patients and providers can reduce fraud.

The OIG is promoting compliance with a HEAT Provider Compliance Training Initiative offering free compliance training. The seminars have been scheduled in Tampa, Kansas City, Baton Rouge, Denver, and Washington, DC throughout the Spring of 2011.

The OIG has also published A Roadmap for New Physicians: Avoiding Medicare and Medicaid Fraud and Abuse, a summary of laws with guidance for physicians to be in compliance.

Additionally, the OIG is now publishing a list of the ten most wanted health care fraud fugitives defrauding taxpayers of $136 million and the 1.888.476.4433 number to call.

The OIG has also created a tip line at 1.800.HHS.TIPS (1.800.447.8477) and an improved website: www.hhs.gov/stop medicarefraud.gov

The RAC, MAC, MIC, Z-PIC audits will continue. Education of clinicians is a must. Home health providers know there is a focus on documentation and medical necessity. Select Data has created a four part series on Insufficient Documentation, Skilled Nursing, Therapy, and Medical Necessity. Visit our website: SelectData.com  or Youtube for the entire free four part series.